In this chapter, you will learn
- —Understand the causes of the decline of the Mughal Empire after 1707
- —Learn about the role of mansabdars, subadars, and nobles in weakening Mughal authority
- —Analyse the impact of foreign invasions by Nadir Shah and Ahmad Shah Abdali
- —Study the rise of regional powers such as Awadh, Bengal, and Hyderabad
- —Examine the Rajput kingdoms and their expansion under rulers like Jai Singh and Ajit Singh
- —Understand the Sikh political organisation through jathas, misls, and the Khalsa
- —Learn about the Maratha Empire, the role of Peshwas, and the system of chauth and sardeshmukhi
- —Study the rise of the Jats under Churaman and Suraj Mal
- —Recognise how political fragmentation made India vulnerable to British expansion
Decline of the Mughal Empire
The Mughal Empire began to decline rapidly after the death of Emperor Aurangzeb in 1707. Aurangzeb was the last powerful Mughal ruler, and after him, a series of weak emperors came to the throne.
Key factors that weakened the empire:
- Weak successors: Emperors after Aurangzeb lacked the ability and vision to hold the vast empire together
- Financial crisis: Constant wars had emptied the treasury; the state could no longer pay its officials and armies properly
- Poor administration: Central authority broke down as provinces became difficult to control from Delhi
- Deccan wars: Aurangzeb spent 25 years fighting long and costly wars in the Deccan, which drained the empire's military and financial resources
Later Mughals:
- After 1707, Mughal emperors became weak puppets controlled by powerful nobles and factions at court
- Some emperors were assassinated or blinded by ambitious nobles who wanted to control the throne
- The emperor's authority was limited to Delhi and its surroundings; real power lay with provincial governors
Exam Tip: Remember that 1707 (death of Aurangzeb) is the starting point of Mughal decline. The empire did not collapse overnight but gradually weakened over decades as provincial rulers became independent.
Exam Tip
Aurangzeb's death in 1707 marks the beginning of Mughal decline. Key reasons: Deccan wars, weak successors, financial crisis, and breakdown of central authority. Later Mughal emperors were puppets of nobles.
Common Mistake
Don't say the Mughal Empire ended in 1707. It continued to exist but became very weak. The empire formally ended much later when the British deposed the last Mughal emperor in 1857.
Causes of Mughal Decline
Several interrelated factors contributed to the decline of the mighty Mughal Empire:
1. Mansabdars and Subadars became independent:
- Mansabdars (military commanders holding ranks) stopped obeying orders from the emperor
- Subadars (provincial governors) began to act as independent rulers in their provinces
- They kept revenue for themselves instead of sending it to Delhi
- Many founded their own dynasties in the provinces they governed
2. Peasant and Zamindar Rebellions:
- Heavy taxation and exploitation drove peasants and zamindars to revolt
- Rebellions disrupted revenue collection and weakened Mughal control over the countryside
- Local chiefs took advantage of the unrest to carve out their own territories
3. Foreign Invasions:
- Nadir Shah's Invasion (1739): The Persian ruler Nadir Shah invaded India and sacked Delhi. He looted immense wealth, including the famous Peacock Throne and the Koh-i-Noor diamond. This invasion exposed the complete military weakness of the Mughals.
- Ahmad Shah Abdali (1748-1761): The Afghan ruler Ahmad Shah Abdali invaded India multiple times, causing destruction in northern India. His invasions further destabilised the already weakened Mughal Empire.
Key Point: The invasions of Nadir Shah (1739) and Ahmad Shah Abdali were not the cause of Mughal decline but rather a consequence of it. They attacked because the empire was already too weak to defend itself.
Exam Tip: When writing about causes of Mughal decline, always mention at least four factors: Deccan wars, independence of mansabdars/subadars, peasant rebellions, and foreign invasions. This will fetch you full marks in board exams.
Exam Tip
Four main causes of Mughal decline: (1) Deccan wars drained resources, (2) Mansabdars/subadars became independent, (3) Peasant and zamindar rebellions, (4) Foreign invasions by Nadir Shah (1739) and Ahmad Shah Abdali (1748-1761).
Common Mistake
Don't list foreign invasions as the main cause of decline. The empire was already weakening from within due to internal problems. Foreign invasions only accelerated the process.
Rise of Regional Powers: Awadh, Bengal, and Hyderabad
As Mughal authority weakened, several regional powers emerged as powerful independent states. The most prominent among them were Awadh, Bengal, and Hyderabad.
Awadh:
- Founded by Saadat Khan Burhan-ul-Mulk, who was appointed subadar of Awadh
- He reduced the number of Mughal-appointed officials and replaced them with his own men
- Revenue was kept locally instead of being sent to Delhi
- Awadh became a prosperous and culturally rich state with its capital at Lucknow
Bengal:
- Murshid Quli Khan established an independent state in Bengal
- He transferred all Mughal appointees and created a loyal administration
- Bengal became one of the wealthiest provinces due to its control over trade and agriculture
- The rich resources of Bengal later attracted the British East India Company
Hyderabad:
- Founded by Nizam-ul-Mulk Asaf Jah in 1724
- He was a powerful Mughal official who became independent in the Deccan
- Hyderabad became the most powerful state in the Deccan region
- The Nizam ruled independently, though he technically owed allegiance to the Mughal emperor
Common features of these states:
- All were founded by former Mughal governors who became independent
- They maintained Mughal administrative systems but kept revenues for themselves
- They appointed their own officials and maintained their own armies
- They continued to acknowledge the Mughal emperor nominally but were practically independent
Exam Tip: Remember that Awadh, Bengal, and Hyderabad were all founded by Mughal officials who became independent. They are examples of how the Mughal system itself created the conditions for its own decline.
Exam Tip
Awadh, Bengal, and Hyderabad were founded by former Mughal subadars who became independent. Key founders: Saadat Khan (Awadh), Murshid Quli Khan (Bengal), Nizam-ul-Mulk Asaf Jah (Hyderabad, 1724). They kept Mughal systems but ruled independently.
Common Mistake
Don't say these states completely broke away from the Mughals. They still nominally acknowledged the Mughal emperor but were practically independent in governance and finances.
The Rajputs
The Rajput kingdoms took advantage of Mughal decline to expand their territories and assert their independence.
Key Rajput Rulers:
- Raja Jai Singh of Amber: One of the most powerful Rajput rulers of this period. He founded the city of Jaipur in 1727, which became a major centre of art, architecture, and learning. Jai Singh was also a noted astronomer who built observatories (Jantar Mantar) in Delhi, Jaipur, Varanasi, Ujjain, and Mathura.
- Ajit Singh of Jodhpur (Marwar): Reclaimed his father's kingdom of Marwar from Mughal control and expanded Rajput territories. He asserted Rajput independence against weak Mughal authority.
Rajput Achievements:
- Built strong forts to defend their kingdoms from invasion
- Founded new capitals such as Jaipur, which was a planned city with wide roads and beautiful architecture
- Expanded their territories by taking over areas previously under Mughal control
- Maintained their distinct cultural identity while participating in the political changes of the time
Key Point: The Rajputs had earlier served the Mughals as mansabdars and allied rulers. With Mughal decline, they reasserted their independence and expanded. Jaipur, founded by Jai Singh, is still known as the "Pink City" and is a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
Exam Tip: Remember the names Jai Singh (Amber/Jaipur) and Ajit Singh (Jodhpur). Jai Singh is especially important for founding Jaipur and building the Jantar Mantar observatories.
Exam Tip
Rajput rulers: Jai Singh of Amber (founded Jaipur, built Jantar Mantar observatories) and Ajit Singh of Jodhpur. They expanded territories and built strong forts when Mughal power weakened.
Common Mistake
Don't confuse Jai Singh of Amber (18th century, founded Jaipur) with Man Singh of Amber (16th century, Akbar's general). They belonged to the same dynasty but lived in different periods.
The Sikhs
The Sikhs emerged as a major political and military power in Punjab during the eighteenth century. Their rise was one of the most remarkable political developments of this period.
Political Organisation:
- Jathas: Small bands of Sikh warriors who organised themselves for defence and governance
- Misls: Larger military confederacies formed by combining several jathas. There were about 12 misls that controlled different parts of Punjab.
- Khalsa: The Sikh community of warrior-saints founded by Guru Gobind Singh in 1699. The Khalsa provided the ideological and military framework for Sikh political power.
The Rakhi System:
- The Sikhs introduced the rakhi system to provide protection to peasants
- In exchange for a small portion of the revenue, Sikh warriors offered protection from invaders and oppressors
- This system helped the Sikhs gain the support and loyalty of the agricultural population
Maharaja Ranjit Singh (1780-1839):
- United the different Sikh misls into a single powerful kingdom
- Made Lahore the capital of the Sikh Empire
- Built one of the most powerful armies in Asia, trained on European lines
- His kingdom extended from the Sutlej River to the Khyber Pass
- Known for his secular approach; employed people from different religions in his administration and army
Exam Tip: Know the progression: Jathas to Misls to Sikh Empire under Ranjit Singh. Also remember the rakhi system (protection for peasants in exchange for revenue) and the role of the Khalsa.
Exam Tip
Sikh political organisation: Jathas (warrior bands) -> Misls (confederacies) -> Sikh Empire under Maharaja Ranjit Singh (capital: Lahore). Key concepts: Khalsa (founded 1699), Rakhi system (protection of peasants).
Common Mistake
Don't confuse the religious founding of Sikhism (Guru Nanak, 15th century) with the political rise of Sikhs (18th century). The Khalsa was founded by Guru Gobind Singh in 1699 but the Sikh Empire came much later under Ranjit Singh.
The Marathas
The Marathas were the most powerful regional force to emerge from the decline of the Mughal Empire. They nearly succeeded in establishing control over much of India.
Foundation by Shivaji Maharaj:
- Shivaji (1627-1680) founded the Maratha kingdom in the Deccan region
- He carved out an independent kingdom by challenging both the Mughals and the Bijapur Sultanate
- He established a strong military and administrative system
- Shivaji was crowned Chhatrapati (sovereign ruler) in 1674
Role of the Peshwas:
- After Shivaji, the Peshwas (prime ministers) became the real power behind the Maratha state
- The Peshwas were based in Pune and controlled the administration effectively
- Under the Peshwas, the Marathas expanded their territory far beyond the Deccan
- Key Peshwas included Balaji Vishwanath, Baji Rao I, and Balaji Baji Rao
Revenue Systems:
- Chauth: One-fourth (25%) of the land revenue collected by Marathas from territories they did not directly rule. This was a form of protection tax - states paid chauth so the Marathas would not attack them.
- Sardeshmukhi: An additional 10% levy claimed by the Marathas as the hereditary revenue collectors (deshmukhs) of the region. This gave them additional income and political authority.
Maratha Expansion:
- By the mid-18th century, the Marathas controlled large areas of India including parts of Delhi, Gujarat, Malwa, and southern India
- They became the most powerful military force in India after Mughal decline
- Maratha power reached its peak under Peshwa Baji Rao I (1720-1740)
Third Battle of Panipat (1761):
- The Marathas suffered a devastating defeat at the hands of Ahmad Shah Abdali at the Third Battle of Panipat in 1761
- Thousands of Maratha soldiers and leaders were killed
- This battle ended Maratha hopes of replacing the Mughals as rulers of all India
- After this defeat, the Maratha Confederacy became fragmented into smaller states
Exam Tip: Chauth (25%) and Sardeshmukhi (10%) are very frequently asked. Remember: Chauth = protection tax from non-Maratha territories. Sardeshmukhi = hereditary claim as revenue collectors. The Third Battle of Panipat (1761) ended Maratha dominance.
Exam Tip
Marathas: Founded by Shivaji, expanded by Peshwas. Revenue: Chauth (25% protection tax) and Sardeshmukhi (10% hereditary claim). Defeated at Third Battle of Panipat (1761) by Ahmad Shah Abdali. This ended their dream of all-India empire.
Common Mistake
Don't confuse Chauth and Sardeshmukhi. Chauth is 25% collected as protection tax; Sardeshmukhi is an additional 10% claimed as the hereditary right of deshmukhs. Together they gave the Marathas 35% of revenue from territories they controlled.
The Jats and Political Fragmentation
The Jats were another important regional power that rose during the eighteenth century, particularly in the area around Delhi and Agra.
Key Jat Leaders:
- Churaman: One of the earliest Jat leaders who organised the community for armed resistance and political power
- Suraj Mal: The most famous Jat ruler who expanded the Jat kingdom significantly. He captured Agra and other important territories. Under his leadership, the Jat state reached its greatest extent.
Bharatpur:
- Bharatpur emerged as the capital and stronghold of the Jat state
- The Jats built a powerful fort at Bharatpur that was considered nearly impregnable
- Even the British later found it very difficult to capture Bharatpur fort
Characteristics of the Jat Kingdom:
- Prosperous agriculturists: The Jats were primarily farming communities who used their agricultural wealth to build political and military power
- Skilled fort builders: They constructed impressive fortifications that protected their territories
- They controlled important trade routes near Delhi and Agra
- Their state was smaller than the Maratha or Sikh kingdoms but was powerful in its region
Political Fragmentation and Its Consequences:
- The eighteenth century saw India break up into many small and medium-sized states
- These states often fought among themselves instead of uniting against common threats
- No single power was strong enough to replace the Mughals and unite India
- This political fragmentation made India vulnerable to British expansion
- The British East India Company took advantage of rivalries between Indian states to gradually conquer the subcontinent
Key Point: The most important consequence of eighteenth-century political formations was political fragmentation. While regional kingdoms flourished culturally and economically, they could not unite against European colonial powers. This fragmentation was the single biggest factor that enabled British conquest of India.
Exam Tip: Always conclude answers on this chapter by connecting regional power struggles to British expansion. Examiners want to see that you understand the link between political fragmentation and colonial conquest.
Exam Tip
Jats: Led by Churaman and Suraj Mal. Capital at Bharatpur (strong fort). Prosperous agriculturists and skilled fort builders. Political fragmentation of India = vulnerability to British expansion. This is the key takeaway of the chapter.
Common Mistake
Don't think the regional kingdoms were weak or backward. Many were prosperous and well-governed. Their problem was not weakness but disunity -- they fought each other instead of uniting against the British.